Essay on The Relativity of Ethical Issues - 1277 Words

Nowadays moral ethics are considered relative. Relative to culture, relative to the needs of a person, relative to circumstances and relative to what one assumes is right or wrong. Everyone has a different perspective on what is true; a person might believe that ‘x’ is true while another may not. The same concept applies to ethics, one person might say killing animals for food is correct and another might say it is incorrect as we can survive on natural food. So each person has a different estimation on making truth claims about ethics, the opinion depends on what is right or wrong and what is ethical and what is not. Social relativism lessens ethics to sociology: what is right is whatever a particular society says is right. Radical†¦show more content†¦Why else would philosophical inquiry be perceived to have advantage except on the assumption that the inquiry, if productive, moves us toward truth? The claim with the assertion that such inquiry is fruitful because it gives us a more complete understanding, or a more comprehensive viewpoint. Many scientists talk about claims being true, e.g., it is true that heparin increases the clotting time of blood. Karl Popper pointed out; science does not progress on the backs of truths, but rather, on the backs of falsifications. A good scientist does not attempt to prove his claim to be true. He tries and proves his theory false. He starts with the illogical hypothesis: If theory X is not true, then Y should not happen. Then, if Y does happen, that shows that it is not the case that theory X is not true. In other words he, is to examine as much evidence as possible, in a manner that is as precise, and as objective as possible, and only after he has failed to prove his theory false, i.e., it is not the case that theory X is not true, it is he justified in proclaiming its truth, the theory an remain open for re-evaluation. The main ethical issue in this chosen content is stem cells. Today a child lies in the hospital dying of heart failure. The expectations are low that he will be one of the people receiving a transplant beforeShow MoreRelatedCultural Relativism in Business1590 Words   |  7 Pages5D Cultural Relativism: Cultural relativism is the view that all beliefs are equally valid and that truth itself is relative, depending on the situation, environment, and individual. Those who hold to cultural relativism hold that all religious, ethical, aesthetic, and political beliefs are completely relative to the individual within a cultural identity. Cultural relativism (CR) says that good and bad are relative to culture. What is good is what is socially approved in a given culture. OurRead MoreEthics : Value Theory, Normative Ethics, And Meta Ethics1501 Words   |  7 Pagesâ€Å"questions about what our guiding ideals should be, in what sort of life is worth living, and how we should treat one another† (Landau). The purpose of these questions allows society to focus the key points of ethics, hedonism, physiological egoism, ethical egoism, and divine command theory. The questions above drive three main recognized points in ethics: Value Theory, Normative Ethics, and Meta Ethics. Value theory raises the question, â€Å"What is the good life?† The good life is driven by what it thatRead MoreConflicting Moral Arguments : Louis Vaughn s Philosophy, Moral Relativism And Moral Objectivism872 Words   |  4 Pageshow things are, but to â€Å"prescribe how things should be† (2). In Philosophy, moral relativism and moral objectivism are two conflicting but somewhat overlapping school of thought. These beliefs govern the way an individual acts; they also decide the ethical guidelines from which the law is written. In this essay we will delineate the differences between the two sects of belief. Pojman asserts that many people self-report as moral subjectivists; he writes that humans fall victim to rashly praising relativismRead MoreEthical Relativism Is An Unsound And Unreliable Ethical Philosophy1742 Words   |  7 Pages Ethical Relativism is an unsound and unreliable ethical philosophy Mohammed Jweihan Ethics for a Global Economy Ethical Relativism is an unsound and unreliable ethical philosophy Cultural and ethical relativisms are widely used theories that explain differences among cultures and their ethics and morals. Morality deals with individual character and the moral rules that are meant to govern and limit one’s character. On the other hand Ethics is somewhat interchangeable with moralsRead More Mackies Arguments Against Objective Values Essay1693 Words   |  7 Pagesanalysis has been occupied by emotivists and descriptivists concerned with the literal meaning of statements, already presupposing Mackie?s style of subjectivity but not developing a defense of this assumption. Conceptual analysis would also limit ethical inquiry to the meanings, just as discussing how color fits the notion of a secondary quality locates the property of color without actually probing its status or scientific workings. Finally, Mackie clarifies that his position concerns objective valuesRead MoreCultural Relativism And The Nature Of Truth Essay1338 Words   |  6 Pagesideologi es between cultures. Cultural relativists emphasizes the element of relativity in relation to a person’s values in the sense that the truth is dependent on or a function of a person’s cultural traditions (Brandt, 2006, p. 1). Even expanding above the notion of personal values, cultural relativism advocates for relativity in terms of ethics. This view ultimately rejects a single â€Å"correct† set of general ethical principles or ethical truth. Cultural relativism enables moral differences between culturesRead MoreA Brief Note On Medical Students Without Borders891 Words   |  4 Pagespublic health efforts. However, STEGHs have been plagued with critiques claiming the programs inflict more harm than aid, which has led to ethical violations, cultural insensitivity, and lack of sustainability. Academic and medical communities have been developing principles to eliminate controversy and encourage cultural humility, long-term sustainability, and ethical protocol. Two-thirds of matriculating medical students expect to participate in a STEGH during medical school (Melby, et al. 2015). TheseRead MoreMoral Relativism And Moral Concepts972 Words   |  4 PagesMoral relativism is a methodological principle of interpretation of the nature of morality underlying ethical theories. It is expressed in the fact that moral concepts and ideas gave extremely relative, changeable and arbitrary. Moral principles, concepts of good and evil are different in different people, social groups, and individuals in a certain way connected with the interests, beliefs, and inclinations of people, limited regarding its value time and place. But this diversity and variabilityRead MoreOutline and Assess the Use of Experiments in Social Psychology Drawing on the Cognitive Social Perspective and Phenomenological Perspective1672 Words   |  7 Pagesquestioned what actually is social psychology, and many answers can be found, however the general consensus of social psychologists is that it is the science of the socially structured mind. Prof Haslam (2006) stated â€Å"For me as a social psychologist, the issue is how is ‘the mind’, how are our thoughts structured by society?† Furthermore I will draw on two of the four main theoretical perspectives of the discipline, the first of which being the cognitive social perspective. The ontology of the perspectiveRead MoreEssay on Phil 1600 Ch 3 Questions685 Words   |  3 Pageseach of Kohlberg’s six stages of moral development? a. Stage 1: Punishment and Obedience i. This means that if one doesn’t obey the authority he will get punished. So moral decisions are made to avoid punishment. b. Stage 2: Instrument and Relativity i. Moral decisions are made based on â€Å"what’s in it for me?† Basically you need a reward system to have order. c. Stage 3: Interpersonal Concordance i. Moral decisions are made in order to maintain good interpersonal relationships. An example